Skip to main content

Minorities pay more for housing than non-minorities:


African-American and Hispanic homebuyers pay more for homes than white and Asian buyers, according to research by four economists—and the biggest differential they found in the four cities they studied is for black buyers in Cook County, Illinois.

Over the past 18 years, home buyers who are Latino and black paid 3.5 percent more than white home buyers for comparable homes in Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco and Washington, D.C. The study tracked more than two million housing transactions in those cities. But in Cook County, Blacks pay 5.4 percent more than whites, according to the study titled “Estimating Racial Price Differentials in the Housing Market.” The 3.5 percent actually translates to $5,000 to $10,000 per sale. Multiply that amount with the average number of times Americans move, every five to seven years, and you will come to a substantial amount.

On the median transaction price of $179,999, the study notes, blacks in Chicago and Cook County would have paid $8,999 more than whites for comparable homes. In the counties outside Cook, the differential is 2.4 percent, lower than the four-city average. Chicago and Cook County Hispanics paid a 3.9 percent premium to buy a house, the study said, and in the collar counties the difference is 1.2 percent. The average premium Hispanics pay in the four cities included in the study is 2.7 percent. The premium paid by Chicago/Cook Hispanics comes out to about $7,019.

The disparities in purchase price were not explained by variation in buyers’ income, wealth or access to credit. Also, the findings did not reveal any clear evidence of racial prejudice or animosity on the part of home sellers, as the premium paid by black and Hispanic buyers did not vary much with the composition of neighborhoods or the race of seller. The researchers said they could not ultimately determine exactly why minority buyers paid more when buying a comparable house. One possible explanation however, is that black and Hispanic buyers were more likely to be first-time home buyers and, as a result, may not be as experienced at negotiating the asking price, according to Pat Bayer the study’s lead author and an economics professor at Duke University. What's more, Bayer noted, minority buyers are shown a limited set of properties by real estate agents and may, therefore, feel like they have to pay more when they see a house that really suits their needs and taste.

Also, Bayer believes that part of the reason Chicago has the largest gap between what blacks and whites pay for homes may be the historical very rigid segregation of Chicago and Cook County.
Regardless of the reason, the researchers said the findings show that minorities continue to pay higher premiums for housing years after the landmark Fair Housing Act of 1968, which prohibits discrimination in housing transactions based on race, gender, religion and other attributes. Paying thousands of dollars more for homes makes it more difficult for minorities to build home equity and wealth. Hopefully, this study will be used to determine what can be done to help reduce the disparity between white and minority homebuyers. A positive outcome is that despite the higher prices, Hispanics represented 51 percent (355,000) of a total of 693,000 new homeowners in 2012. 

Comments

  1. Quite interesting that the study did not reveal a clear evidence of racial prejudice but at the same time it shows that minorities are paying more for housing. From my experience, discrimination in housing is rarely direct but rather subtle and indirect. I believe Fair housing agencies should pay closer attention to indirect forms of housing discrimination.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Pinklining"? Innovative way to deny women home loans

From redlining to  “pinklining,” a term most people have probably never heard, is hurting women and especially women of color.  The term comes from the 1970's term   redlining . T he term used by governments, agencies, banks and other lenders to deny people of color access to mortgages and credit. Those in charge of public policy and lending practices would draw a redline around certain neighborhoods with high concentrations of minorities and deny them financing and other forms of credit if they lived within those lines. Now, more specifically lenders are using the term "pinklining" ala redlining to identify neighborhoods and deny woman of color the chance to buy homes. Is There a Gender Gap in Home Equity Loans? (investopedia.com)

News Roundup: March 15-26

NFHA President Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee (Reading the full testimony is strongly recommended for anyone interested Fair Housing issues.) On March 11, Shanna Smith of the National Fair Housing Alliance (NHFA) testified before the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommitte on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, with a presentation titled "Protecting the American Dream: A Look at the Fair Housing Act." The testimony emphasizes that in spite of our efforts, the nation still falls "dramatically short of reaching the actual goals of the Fair Housing Act" which is designed to "eliminate housing discrimination and to promote residential integration." "While people are working together in greater numbers than ever before--many go home each night to racially segregated neighborhoods." Shanna "explores the nature and extent of housing discrimination as it is manifested today, how enforcement action is moving ...

SunTrust $21Million Settlement with DOJ

This past Thursday, Businessweek covered a massive settlement in a federal lawsuit alleging racial discrimination in SunTrust’s lending practices. The suit, filed by the US DOJ, was filed in the U.S. District Court in Richmond, VA, alleging more than 20,000 African-American and Hispanic borrowers were charged more than similarly-situated and qualified non-Hispanic white borrowers, between 2005 and 2009. The suit alleged that minority borrowers in 75 geographic markets from Virginia Beach, VA to San Francisco, CA, paid more in loan fees, or were charged higher interest rates based solely on race or national origin. A consent order filed with the complaint says SunTrust denies any wrongdoing, but agreed to the settlement. "SunTrust strongly believes in the principles of fair lending," company spokesman Mike McCoy in Atlanta said. "We are pleased to have reached a settlement and put this matter behind us." Settlements like this come as a surprise, considering the...