Skip to main content


Back in February, we reported the ongoing efforts by housing advocates and Cook County Commissioner Jesus Garcia, to amend the Cook County Human Rights Ordinance (CCHRO) to include protections for housing choice voucher holders. On May 8, 2013, the Cook County Board voted 9-6 to exclude section 8 as a non-source of income protection. The amendment will extend significant protections to section 8 recipients, minorities and people with disabilities.

The new law amends the county’s human rights ordinance to effectively prohibit landlords from refusing to rent to potential tenants on the basis of their participation in the section 8 voucher program. A similar policy has been in place in the city of Chicago since 2003. Six other municipalities in Illinois, ten states, the District of Columbia, and ten counties across the country have laws in place that protect individuals from discrimination based on using housing choice vouchers.

Many obstacles inhibited the progress of this amendment. This included stereotypes surrounding voucher holders. Many housing providers assumed vouchers holders will be bad neighbors and decrease property value or will bring crime. That stereotype builds from the fact that, because voucher holders are often refused housing, they are forced to live in high crime, high poverty neighborhoods and communities where the vouchers are accepted. Additionally, studies have proven that housing providers refuse to rent to voucher holders as a pretext for other types of illegal discrimination based on race, familial status, and disability.  There was also some opposition from realtors and landlord groups who have argued that the amendment would restrict landlords' freedom to participate in a government program.

However, voucher holders are some of the most scrutinized tenants and must meet the rigorous criteria of the voucher administration as well as comply with lease provisions. Nearly 40% of voucher recipients are employed and more than 30% are seniors or persons with disabilities. There is absolutely no evidence that persons who use housing choice vouchers make increase crime in communities. Landlords only have to complete three forms. Payments made by the housing authority are made electronically. Units must pass a Housing Quality Standards inspection and voucher recipients have to complete most of the paperwork.
Commissioner Garcia noted, “The adoption of this amendment would remove a cloud that has hung over Cook County government for many years. Currently our human rights amendment allows [landlords] to declare less advantaged persons in Cook County as persona non grata – that means people who are not welcome.” County Board President Toni Preckwinkle also expressed her support for the proposal prior to the board’s vote. The vote to amend the Ordinance ensures that those with housing choice vouchers will no longer be legally discriminated against based on their sources of income. It also sounds the warning that discrimination of this type will no longer be tolerated in Cook County!


  1. Your report misses the mark for african people and does not address the new details of the social evil born out of section 8 other hidden sub policies and practices that encourges housing discrimination for african people in chicago. For a detailed explanation: see my post on section eight for a detailed understanding of how and why african and black people are robbed of thier section 8 and housing vouchers and how this lottery system is and was designed to prevent new black and african apllicants from getting fair short the movement to prevent and limit fair housing is nothing more than the new housing descrimination for black and african poeple.

  2. You may see my analysis of facebook posted tody on the facebook post on section 8 housing of which i responded as a rebuttal post.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More Stringent Standard for Organizational Standing and the Need to Keep an Eye on this Issue.

Equal Rights Ctr. v. Post Props. 657 F. Supp. 2d 197 (D.D.C. 2009)Decided September 28, 2009

This case stands on the principle that organizational standing is not available when an organization's injury is self-inflicted. Whether we are seeing a more stringent principle being promulgated, a refinement in the law or a case of bad strategy is unclear.
Equal Rights Center ("ERC"), an organization devoted to advancing civil rights and fair housing for everyone, brought suit against Post Properties for allegedly failing to bring their buildings into compliance with accessibility provisions in the American Disabilities Act ("ADA") and Fair Housing Act ("FHA"). Post Properties owns and manages more than 21,000 apartment units across five states. According to the Court's description of the facts, ERC, on its own accord, chose to investigate one of Post's buildings to determine whether they were in compliance with accessibility laws.
The issue in …

SunTrust $21Million Settlement with DOJ

This past Thursday, Businessweek covered a massive settlement in a federal lawsuit alleging racial discrimination in SunTrust’s lending practices. The suit, filed by the US DOJ, was filed in the U.S. District Court in Richmond, VA, alleging more than 20,000 African-American and Hispanic borrowers were charged more than similarly-situated and qualified non-Hispanic white borrowers, between 2005 and 2009.

The suit alleged that minority borrowers in 75 geographic markets from Virginia Beach, VA to San Francisco, CA, paid more in loan fees, or were charged higher interest rates based solely on race or national origin.

A consent order filed with the complaint says SunTrust denies any wrongdoing, but agreed to the settlement. "SunTrust strongly believes in the principles of fair lending," company spokesman Mike McCoy in Atlanta said. "We are pleased to have reached a settlement and put this matter behind us."

Settlements like this come as a surprise, considering the…

Can Landlords Discriminate Based on Arrest Records?

Marie Claire Tran-Leung disagrees. According to Tran-Leung, “Landlords and local housing authorities should stop using arrest records to screen tenants.” She states that doing so does “more harm than good.”

Although it is illegal for landlords to discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disabilities, and other protected classes under the Federal Fair Housing Act, most states have also applied protection to other classes. For example, the State of Illinois prohibits discrimination based on ancestry, age, marital status, and sexual orientation. Discrimination against people with arrest records, however, is legal.

But should it be? Tran-Leung claims that discrimination based on arrest records “give[s] people a false sense of security against crime, and they deprive disproportionately more racial minorities of needed rental housing for nothing more than an unproven accusation.” Read the full story here.

Tran-Leung cites a recent decision by the Illinois Appellate Co…