Skip to main content

Discrimination because of Aids continues…


On December 4, 2012, Housing works reported a landmark decision that found NYC’s second largest realtor guilty of housing discrimination against people living with AIDS.  District Court Judge Samuel Conti ruled in Short v. Manhattan Apartments, Inc. that two New York City Realtors, Manhattan Apartments, Inc. (MA) and Abba Realty Associates, Inc. (Abba), discriminated against Keith Short and other individuals, who have AIDS, on the basis of their disability and because of their source of income--New York City’s HIV/AIDS Services Administration (HASA) rental assistance program.

Mr. Short, a 45-year-old disabled man who suffers from AIDS, attempted to rent apartments from various real estate brokers, including MA.  Mr. Short planned to finance his rent with a subsidy from HASA.  MA allegedly refused to show him Mr. Short any apartments merely because of his disability and his source of financing the unit. As a result Mr. Short was homelessness for several months.

Mr. Short contacted the Fair Housing Justice Center ("FJHC"). FJHC accepted his case and sent testers to assess MA's rental practices. Testers tape record their interactions. MA employees allegedly refused to show apartments to FJHC testers using HASA financing, notwithstanding that MA, at the same time, actively tried to rent apartments in the same price range to non-disabled testers.

In his ruling, Judge Conti concluded that the evidence showed that MA refused to assist Mr. Short because he received HASA rental assistance benefits.  He also ruled that evidence established that Abba likewise refused to show HASA clients certain apartments because, those apartments were not available to persons with HASA or other government rental subsidies.  More significantly, Judge Conti observed that, discrimination in this context is particularly damaging because for people with AIDS, ‘housing is healthcare.”

In a similar vein, Fred Freiberg, executive director of FHJC, said, “The unmistakable message in this decision for housing a provider is that source of income discrimination will not be tolerated…”

Judge Conti awarded both Mr. Short and FHJC compensatory damages and issued an injunction prohibiting the defendants from discriminating on the basis of a lawful source of income and requiring the defendants, among other things, to undergo fair housing training and to adopt and post non-discrimination policies.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SunTrust $21Million Settlement with DOJ

This past Thursday, Businessweek covered a massive settlement in a federal lawsuit alleging racial discrimination in SunTrust’s lending practices. The suit, filed by the US DOJ, was filed in the U.S. District Court in Richmond, VA, alleging more than 20,000 African-American and Hispanic borrowers were charged more than similarly-situated and qualified non-Hispanic white borrowers, between 2005 and 2009. The suit alleged that minority borrowers in 75 geographic markets from Virginia Beach, VA to San Francisco, CA, paid more in loan fees, or were charged higher interest rates based solely on race or national origin. A consent order filed with the complaint says SunTrust denies any wrongdoing, but agreed to the settlement. "SunTrust strongly believes in the principles of fair lending," company spokesman Mike McCoy in Atlanta said. "We are pleased to have reached a settlement and put this matter behind us." Settlements like this come as a surprise, considering the...
6 comments
Read more

Housing Discrimination Alive and Well in the 21st Century

Some people are in denial that in this day and age, discrimination simply does not exist anymore. Taking things at face value, one can see how an individual may be lulled into a false sense of security – legislation designed to protect minorities, affirmative action, et cetera, exist for the advancement of colored peoples in this nation. However, according to a recent study by the Consumer Action group , all is not fair in home and housing. Consumer Action contacted 5,000 community organizations across the country, compiling information from 549 respondents, who reported “serious issues with housing discrimination.” The survey shows that immigrants, the disabled, and families with children aren’t welcome in some places, and that “immigrants face the greatest hardships in finding legal recourse for housing discrimination.” One reason, Consumer Action claims, may be cultural barriers. Non-English-speaking minorities could be left out in the cold by unfair housing practices. The study ...
4 comments
Read more

"Pinklining"? Innovative way to deny women home loans

From redlining to  “pinklining,” a term most people have probably never heard, is hurting women and especially women of color.  The term comes from the 1970's term   redlining . T he term used by governments, agencies, banks and other lenders to deny people of color access to mortgages and credit. Those in charge of public policy and lending practices would draw a redline around certain neighborhoods with high concentrations of minorities and deny them financing and other forms of credit if they lived within those lines. Now, more specifically lenders are using the term "pinklining" ala redlining to identify neighborhoods and deny woman of color the chance to buy homes. Is There a Gender Gap in Home Equity Loans? (investopedia.com)
Post a Comment
Read more